Noosa 360

  • facebook
  • linkdine
  • instagram
  • Follow Sandy on Social Media
ESTIMATES HEARINGS 2026 SUMMARY – AUGUST 2026

Transparency, accountability and good governance are fundamental to a healthy democracy. Queenslanders deserve confidence that public funds are spent wisely, government decisions properly scrutinised, and elected representatives genuine opportunities to hold ministers to account.

That is why the Budget Estimates process remains an important parliamentary mechanism, providing Members of Parliament the opportunity to question ministers and senior public servants on the State Budget, examine government expenditure and performance, and ensure commitments made to communities are being delivered and that ultimately pass the ‘pub test’.

As part of our ongoing advocacy regarding failings within these systems and processes, we continue to push for broader parliamentary and electoral reforms. While there had been minor improvements to parliamentary and estimates processes under the previous government, unfortunately these have since been reversed including the additional Opposition and crossbench member questions which reduced  the allocation for government’ ‘Dorothy Dixer’ questions. Their reversal has resulted in a significant loss of valuable scrutiny time for non-government members and a return to lengthy periods where government members ask predictable questions that promote government policies rather than hold ministers to account.

Recognising these limitations, we supplemented our hearing questions by submitting Questions on Notice to ministers as part of our scrutiny efforts. These covered issues relevant to the Noosa electorate including on policing, victim assistance, courts, prisoner rehabilitation, gambling advertising reforms, child safety, disaster funding, affordable housing, regional planning, business support, tourism, the shark control program, electoral and parliamentary reform, and many others.

During our Health, Environment and Innovation Committee hearing, we also questioned ministers on matters affecting and of interest to our community, including palliative care, dental services, environmental protections, the Noosa North Shore Landing Ground saga.

The following is not a short read, so you may wish to use the ‘Control F’ search function on your computer to jump to the topics that interest you most.

To view Sandy’s 2026–27 Budget Summary, including her Budget Reply Speech, please visit https://sandybolton.com/budget-2026-27-summary/.

Written and video transcripts for the 2026 Estimates Committee hearings are available on the Queensland Parliament website at www.parliament.qld.gov.au/Work-of-Committees/Estimates-Hearings

If Noosa electorate residents have any questions regarding any of the matters below, please contact our office via noosa@parliament.qld.gov.au or on 5319 3100.

History on many of the issues we have raised during this process is available at Noosa 360 at https://sandybolton.com/noosa-360/   Just type the topic into the search bar, with the most recent update at the top.

SANDY’S QUESTIONS SUBMITTED BEFORE AND DURING ESTIMATE HEARINGS 2026

Please note that questions are grouped together by issue and are presented in the order responses were received. Under each issue heading you will find Sandy’s question followed by the government’s response, shown in italics. Where responses did not fully address the question asked, further correspondence has been, or will be, sent seeking clarification or additional information.

Responses yet to received will be inserted once they arrive!

Minister for Environment and Tourism and Minister for Science and Innovation

Questions on Notice

Noosa North Shore Landing Ground Reserve

Q. With reference to the Department of the Environment, Tourism, Science and Innovation Service Delivery Statement (p. 1), regarding the expansion of Queensland’s protected area network, will the Minister advise:

a) whether any departmental resources have been allocated during 2026-27 to progress consideration of revocation of any part of the former Noosa Landing Ground Reserve (Noosa North/Teewah Airfield), including site management and maintenance activities;

b) what consultation has occurred since 1 July 2025 regarding any potential revocation, including the stakeholder groups consulted;

c) what intended land uses and management arrangements are being considered should any revocation proceed, and whether any use/permit considerations facilitate expanding or exceeding previous recreational and emergency services usage; and,

d) what portion of the former Landing Ground Reserve is currently being considered for potential revocation?

As previously communicated in correspondence to the Member for Noosa dated 21 April 2026, the former Noosa North Shore Landing Ground Reserve (the Lot) was transferred to the Department of the Environment, Tourism, Science and Innovation (DETSI) and subsequently gazetted as national park on 19 September 2024 under the former Labor government. However, it is clear the transition to protected area was not effectively planned. As outlined in my response to the Member for Noosa’s question without notice (of 5 March 2026), the current use of the Lot as a landing ground does not align with the principles of the Nature Conservation Act 1992.

 a) DETSI continues to explore options for the recreation clubs within existing departmental resources.

b) Since July 2025, as part of exploring alternative options, the department has consulted with the Department of Natural Resources and Mines, Manufacturing and Regional and Rural Development regarding future land tenure options and has commenced engagement with Native Title holders. On 14 April 2026, I also met with representatives of Sunshine Coast Sports Aviators Club to ensure their perspectives are considered in finalising options.

c) As consultation is ongoing it would not be appropriate to comment. The site is an important training and operational area for emergency aviation services, including LifeFlight and its predecessor, the Sunshine Coast Helicopter Rescue Service.

d) The footprint of the existing recreational use (three runways and hangars)

 Related Questions asked during the Health, Environment and Innovation Committee Estimates Hearing:

Q. Director-General, with reference to the response to prehearing question on notice No. 11 regarding the former Noosa North Shore airfield, can you advise why it was deemed inappropriate to comment whether any use permit considerations would expand or exceed previous recreational and emergency service usage?

Thank you. I acknowledge that the Noosa North Shore Landing Ground Reserve was transferred into the Great Sandy National Park by the previous government and arrangements to address the existing airfield users are still in progress. We are carefully considering the needs of existing users whilst prioritising the preservation of the area’s significant environmental values. Since July 2025, as part of exploring alternative options, we are also consulting with the Department of Natural Resources and Mines, Manufacturing and Regional and Rural Development regarding future land tenure options. We have also commenced engagement with native title holders. Options to achieve an effective and balanced outcome are certainly being considered. As this matter is under consideration, it would not be appropriate for me at this point in time to discuss those details.

Q. Director-General, it has been very difficult to get some clear answers and it is a simple question. In the considerations, can you rule out any expansion of previous usage by existing or previous permit holders or potential new ones? I refer to the great difficulties the community had in the 1980s when that particular site was targeted by a proposal for commercial jets.

Thank you, member. I acknowledge the frustration as well. We are comprehensively consulting with the stakeholders and exploring options. We are only looking at existing users at this point in time. In terms of looking at those options, it would be inappropriate for me to pre-empt those considerations. That is as much information as I can provide at this time. 

Q. In the engagement with stakeholders, given that we cannot get a response on that, are Noosa council and the broader community being consulted?

Thank you. We are engaging with the Noosa council and surrounding stakeholders. The minister is also part of those engagements. If you would like to hear from him, he is directly consulting as well.

Q. Minister, can we get some reassurances, please?

I thank the member for the question. I can reassure the member that the conversations are only around the existing users. You are well aware that there are a number of recreational aviation groups that currently use the site and also LifeFlight uses it for training purposes. They are the only users we are considering. The reason we are in this situation is that the entire site was made national park by the former government, including this area. Whilst it is possible for those groups to transition away from it, it is not a practice that can continue in a national park. It is inconsistent with the Nature Conservation Act, which is why we are having to have these negotiations. I appreciate the member for Noosa’s frustration—I really do—but you would also appreciate, as you saw in our response to the member in the question on notice, that part of that is engagement with traditional owners, which is ironic given the previous question from the member for Nudgee. That is something we want to get right as we consider the options. I want to assure you that there is no commercialisation aspect, as you alluded to, being considered as part of this.

 Queensland Waste Strategy

Q.  With reference to the Department of the Environment, Tourism, Science and Innovation Service Delivery Statement (p. 2), which provides $267.6 million over five years for continued investment in waste reduction and recycling initiatives under the Less Landfill, More Recycling 2035: Queensland Waste Strategy, will the Minister advise:

a) the funding allocated by program stream in 2026-27;

b) whether Noosa Shire Council’s covered resource recovery facility forms part of this funding or other program;

c) what additional funding opportunities are available to Noosa Shire Council and local organisations for waste reduction and recycling initiatives;

d) whether projects involving batteries, soft plastics, solar panels, organics, e-waste or decommissioned wind turbines are eligible; and,

e) what regional performance measures will be used to assess recycling and landfill diversion outcomes?

The Queensland Government’s Less Landfill, More Recycling 2035: Queensland Waste Strategy is backed by $975 million over five years. This includes $487 million over five years through the Waste Reduction and Recycling Activation Fund (WRRAF) and $488 million over four years for annual payments to councils to help offset the costs of the waste levy.

After a decade of declining recycling performance, Queensland had the second worst recycling rate in the country. The new Queensland Waste Strategy is taking action to increase recycling and reduce waste sent to landfill.

a) The 2026-27 State Budget includes additional funding of $267.6 million ($214 million for annual payments to councils and $53.6 million additional funding for the WRRAF).

 Funding aligned with the new Waste Strategy includes:

  • $40 million additional funding to the Resource Recovery Boost Fund, bringing the total funding to support councils to establish critical recycling infrastructure to $170 million;
  • $12.5 million Residual Waste Fund to support energy from waste initiatives;
  • $11 million Regional Recycling Transport Fund to support transporting recyclables in the regions;
  • $18.5 million Recycle Wise Education Fund to support education and awareness;
  • $11.7 million Waste Technology and Innovation Fund which will help support new waste technologies;
  • $55 million for the Growing the Recovery of Organic Waste via the Food Organic and Garden Organics (GROW FOGO) Fund; and
  • $17.7 million for the Fighting Illegal Dumping Partnership Program.

In 2026-27, more than $100 million has been allocated under the WRRAF under the following funding streams:

  • $60.079 million Recycling Infrastructure;
  • $5.490 million Statewide Education and Behaviour Change;
  • $18.974 million Regulatory Assessment and Compliance;
  • $13.390 million Waste Technology and Trials;
  • $3.9 million Rebates and Assistance; and
  • $0.5 million Sustainability Programs.

 b) Yes. Noosa Shire Council has already benefitted from some of this funding and was successful for larger household recycling bins (yellow lid bins) and upgrades to the Noosa Resource Recovery Centre. This upgrade will improve landfill diversion for municipal solid waste and construction and demolition waste, complementing other resource recovery activities delivered on site.

 c) As outlined above, there are a number of new funding programs aligned with the new Waste Strategy. This will be broadly communicated with all councils.

 d) A number of the funding programs will help directly respond to priority wastes like batteries, plastics, organics and e-waste. For example, the GROW FOGO program guidelines were recently expanded to allow council funding for equipment that supports more at-home food organics diversion, such as through home composting.

Our Local Government Battery Collection Program is helping councils to deliver additional collection points for batteries, including batteries embedded in other goods like vapes or e-scooters. Noosa Shire Council received $75,000 under this Program to install five smart safety drums for collection of smaller problem batteries, located at publicly accessible Council facilities, and two battery safety bins for larger and mixed chemistry problem batteries at waste transfer stations.

 The new $11.7 million Waste Technology and Innovation Fund is being developed to help industry take up new technology and new approaches to manage priority wastes at scale and with a strong commercial end market for recycled materials. Outside of direct program funding, the Queensland Government will also continue to advocate for stronger national action on mandatory product stewardship for priority wastes like packaging, batteries and solar panels.

 e) A range of regionally specific targets have been set in the new Waste Strategy and progress towards those targets will be reported on annually. Funding programs will also be designed to maximise impact and outcomes, seeking to maximise the diversion of waste from landfill on a sustainable and commercial basis. For example, projects from round one of the Resource Recovery Boost Fund are set to divert 150,000 tonnes of waste from landfill and save councils about $17 million a year in waste levy costs.

Additional Questions were not asked during the Health, Environment and Innovation Committee Estimates Hearing due to lack of time allocation.

 Cooloola Recreation Area

Q. Director-General, have there been any increases in the budget or new initiatives specifically for managing areas of high tourism such as the Cooloola Recreation Area and the Noosa National Park to ensure positive visitor experiences?

I thank the member and want to acknowledge Cooloola. It is certainly one of Queensland’s most popular recreation areas and we are doing as much as we can between our tourism division but also our parks division, which I know you know well, in keeping them safe, well managed and enjoyable and protecting their natural and cultural values. We are responding to growing visitor numbers. We know that there is an increase in visitation and a lot of people wanting to come and particularly visit that area and we know there is a management plan that is being put together. While the minister is correct in that the budget specific to your question around parks will be tabled in the further session, I would say that in Destination 2045 there are a number of different programs to support new tourism experiences and product development. I think the minister just announced the RTIF, the Regional Tourism Infrastructure Fund, which will obviously work with local operators to expand and enhance their experiences. We know that there is a tourism icons fund as well. We know that there is funding available for programs to work specifically with operators. We also know that through Tourism and Events Queensland there are additional marketing funds. With regard to aviation—and we had an earlier discussion—there is the Connecting Queensland Fund, and we are working with all regional airports as well as those in our cities. There are a number of elements of funding available to support not just increasing tourism but obviously managing the cultural values and natural values of these places that are very loved.

Minister for Health and Ambulance Services

Questions on Notice

Non-Government Community Hospice & Palliative Care

Q. With reference to the Queensland Health Service Delivery Statement, which identifies Sub and Non-Acute Care services, including palliative care, geriatric evaluation and management, and maintenance care (p. 8), will the Minister advise:

a) the recurrent funding allocated in 2026-27 to each non-government community hospice in Queensland, reported by provider;

b) whether Queensland Health has assessed the cost of establishing a consistent statewide funding model for non-government community hospices, including support for clinical and nursing costs; and,

c) whether demand modelling has been undertaken for community based palliative care by Hospital and Health Service?

 As at, 16 July 2026, Queensland Health, through the Community Services Funding Branch, provides combined funding of approximately $32.84 million (excl GST) in 2026-27 to 10 organisations to deliver 16 palliative care services in Queensland. A further $2.29 million (excl GST) in 2026-27 is provided for predominantly non-clinical palliative care initiatives, such as peak services, help-line services, service system development, Ambulance Wish, and data collection systems support.

 NGOs currently receive funding through individual service agreements which reflect the services delivered, local community needs and existing service arrangements including the model of care. To support community based palliative care services, Queensland Health undertook a review of the funding and contractual arrangements for these NGOs. Which resulted in $4.1 million in additional funding from 2024-45 per year being provided to, at that point in time, eight NGOs.

 Queensland Health regularly publishes details of funding to third party organisations, including palliative care providers, on the Open Data portal website available online at www.data.qld.gov.au/organization/queensland-health.

 These investments are in addition to the funding arrangements directly between Hospital and Health Services.

I am advised that Queensland Health has undertaken demand and need modelling for palliative care at Hospital and Health Service level to support local service planning, including for community-based care.

Related Questions asked during the Health, Environment and Innovation Committee Estimates Hearing:

 Q. My question is to the director-general or to Dr Gillies, the chief executive of the Sunshine Coast Hospital and Health Service, regarding the response to prehearing question on notice No. 11. Can the director-general provide what the demand modelling revealed for the Sunshine Coast Hospital and Health Service in relation to community-based palliative care, and what service and budget provisions have been made in response to the current closures of the Katie Rose and Fraser Coast hospices?

I am happy to talk to the demand modelling for palliative care. We have an extensive process through Queensland Health to understand community health needs. That is a process which is variably called things, including ‘local area needs analysis’—the terminology does evolve over time. It is an extensive process. It is undertaken by and led through the Department of Health by our strategy, policy and planning division where we have a team of experts who understand the needs for health care, which includes demographic, aging, disease burden et cetera. We work in very close association with our stakeholder partners, particularly with the Primary Health Networks. Every hospital and health service will have a well-established local area needs analysis and will have an understanding of their internal capacity to meet those local needs. It is one of the reasons we have a model for funding health across the state of Queensland whereby we provide funding to the Hospital and Health Services to meet their needs but then we give each individual HHS the flexibility to direct those funds into the clinical services according to their local needs rather than having that prescribed from a central area. We have had extensive investment in palliative care across the state of Queensland in both our inpatient palliative care services and our community funded palliative care services. In the last 12 months we had 10 different contracts for 16 different services in community palliative care, and those contracts will progress through. We continue to have 10 different organisations in the community sector providing palliative care variably across the state, according to that needs distribution. I am very confident that we have a clear understanding of where our area needs are. Also, I am very confident that the health service chief executives are furnished with that information to allow them 28 July 2026 Estimates—Health and Ambulance Services (Proof) 15 to make the appropriately informed decisions about where and how those services are optimally provided so they can provide not only the best opportunities for their local communities but also the efficient investment of the taxpayer dollar to deliver those services.

Q. Dr Gillies, what budget provisions have been made in response to the closure of the Katie Rose hospice?

We have looked at the level of service we provide for the rest of the Sunshine Coast and Gympie regions and are committed to providing the same level of service to the Noosa region after the closure of Katie Rose. That will involve providing inpatient bed capacity at the Dove unit in Caloundra and we will be increasing nursing staffing to make sure we can provide a seven-day service to the Noosa region.

Q. Will that incorporate in-home 24/7 care?

The current system operates during the day that we provide an in-home service. We try to have a proactive approach to plan around things like pain management to make sure that patients’ pain overnight is under control and being well looked after. At this point, nowhere else in the region do we offer an onsite after-hours service. We provide that through the Dove unit. People will travel there and we will manage them—or we will manage them remotely, which works well for the rest of the region.

Noosa Dental Clinic

Q. With reference to the Queensland Health Service Delivery Statement (p. 1) which states that the Government is committed to “delivering health services closer to Queenslanders”, “empowering local decision-making” and “decentralise resources”, and the Noosa Dental Clinic, will the Minister advise what assessment has been undertaken regarding:

a) the consistency of any proposed reduction or centralisation of services away from the Noosa Dental Clinic with these commitments;

b) the impact on Noosa residents required to travel to alternative public dental facilities, including impacts on travel times, access and the public dental waitlist;

c) increasing Noosa to a four chair service against moving the two chairs to Nambour; and d. workforce options to retain and expand services at the Noosa Dental Clinic?

 I refer the Committee to answers to Questions on Notice 1136 of 2025 and 536 of 2026.

 Q.Dr Gillies, in relation to the Noosa Dental Clinic, was an alternative site in Noosa looked at in order to expand to four chairs instead of moving two chairs to Nambour?

 No. We did not look at alternative locations in Noosa.

 Mental Health Levy

Q. With reference to the funding from the Queensland mental health levy—I think there was $394 million and $93.2 million—were any increases allocated to the Sunshine Coast Hospital and Health Service and, if so, were any for longer stay mental health beds?

The member for Noosa asked about the mental health levy. She may care to know that now. There is no increase allocated from the levy for long-stay mental health beds, but there is additional funding for eight perinatal mother and baby beds, and continuation of four mental health intensive care unit and eight older person beds at SCUH and $8.9 million for tiny homes has been introduced as well.

Ambulance Services

Q. Within any increases in the budget, what provisions are being made to continue efforts to reduce the delays experienced within the Noosa region to triple-O calls?

We have seen a 7.9 per cent increase in our budget allocation for the 2026-27 financial year. Specifically for Noosa, we are putting additional staff into the Sunshine Coast area. We put nine additional staff into the North Coast region communication centre, the triple-O centre you would be familiar with; seven additional staff into Tewantin; and two critical care paramedics into the north of the Sunshine Coast area. Overall, for the Sunshine Coast-Wide Bay region we have put on 27 additional staff in this year. In terms of capital, there is an additional 15 replacement vehicles and four additional new vehicles—the four additional to service the additional staff that are going into the area. We have, through our planning and through our base capital allocation over the forward estimates, seen a market upturn in our ability to turn out fleet. We were provisioned for 170 new and replacement fleet last year. We were able to deliver 233. That additional 63 replacements that we had not planned for reduces the age of our fleet and reduces the downtime of our fleet, vehicle costs and maintenance, and all of that turns into more available for the community. Specifically for the Noosa area, I think it is probably fair to say the communication centre staff—the seven additional into Tewantin and the two additional critical care paramedics into the north of the area.

Minister for Families, Seniors and Disability Services and Minister for Child Safety and the Prevention of Domestic and Family Violence

Community Transport Program

Q. With reference to the Department of Transport and Main Roads Service Delivery Statement (p.8), which states that the Department provides funding for accessible passenger transport services to deliver economic, social and community benefits. Will the Minister advise

a) the total 2026–27 funding allocated to Community Transport Program services operating within the Noosa Electorate,

b) the funded provider or providers and the value of each service agreement,

c) whether the current service agreements for those services have been finalised and the period they cover,

d) the number of clients assisted and trips delivered within the Noosa Electorate during 2024–25 and 2025–26, and (e) what process the Department uses to assess requests for additional funding where demand exceeds contracted service levels.

Any questions related to the Department of Transport and Main Roads Services Delivery Statement (page 8) should be referred to the Honourable Brent Mickelberg MP, Minister for Transport and Main Roads. With regard to the Community Transport Program delivered by the Department of Families, Seniors, Disability Services and Child Safety (DFSDSCS), I can advise that work continues on investment throughout the state, including the Noosa Electorate. As per previous correspondence with your electorate office, a procurement activity seeking a service in Noosa was not successful. DFSDSCS is actively planning for future investment in Noosa And when contracted, this service will focus on increasing connection for Queenslanders under 65 years of age, who have limited or no access to appropriate, affordable transport.

Children’s Domestic Violence Counselling

Q. With reference to the Department of Families, Seniors, Disability Services and Child Safety Service Delivery Statement (p.7), which includes the Prevention of Domestic and Family Violence service area and the performance measure “Number of domestic and family violence counselling service users with cases closed/finalised as a result of the majority of identified needs being met”. Will the Minister advise

a) whether specialist domestic and family violence refuge providers are funded to deliver counselling services for both parent/carer and accompanying children,

b) whether funding for counselling services is determined by the number of families accommodated, the number of children accommodated, hours of counselling delivered, or another funding methodology,

c) whether the Department has assessed whether the current funding model adequately reflects the counselling needs of families with multiple children,

d) whether the Department collects data on unmet demand for counselling services within domestic and family violence refuges, and

e) whether the Government will review the counselling funding model to better reflect the number and needs of children accommodated in refuge services.

DFSDSCS provides funding to 54 shelters across Queensland, with the Department of Housing and Public Works funding and managing these capital assets. Shelters provide temporary accommodation with case management support to women and children experiencing domestic and family violence (DFV), who are homeless or at risk of homelessness.

Support in shelters focuses on stabilising families in crisis, with emphasis on immediate safety planning and thorough risk assessment. The primary goal is to create a foundation for transitioning to safe and secure housing, while supporting families to rebuild lives free from violence. Specialist DFV refuge providers are not funded to deliver counselling services directly. Instead, DFSDSCS funds a range of counselling services delivered by specialist providers with expertise in both adults’ and children’s counselling.

The Queensland Government is committed to improving safety and outcomes for victim survivors through the Safer Families, Safer Communities: A domestic and family violence reform strategy for Queensland (the Strategy). The Strategy outlines a vision for a Queensland where individuals feel safe in their homes and communities.

The Domestic, Family and Sexual Violence Commissioning Framework will underpin the delivery of the Strategy. Over the next five years, the framework will guide investment in domestic, family and sexual violence services across Queensland.

Foster carer support

Q. With reference to the Department of Families, Seniors, Disability Services and Child Safety Service Delivery Statement (p.1), which states the Department will continue with the transition of investment in family-based care services and pilot a new Professional Foster Care program, and the 2026–27 Budget measures supporting foster and kinship carers – Will the Minister advise:

a) which categories of foster and kinship carers will receive increased financial support under the 2026–27 Budget,

b) how many approved foster and kinship carers will receive no increase beyond routine indexation,

c) whether the Department has undertaken any assessment of the actual costs incurred by foster and kinship carers relative to current allowance rates, including by age of child and placement type,

d) whether that assessment will be published, and

e) whether further reforms to foster and kinship carer financial support are being considered to improve carer recruitment and retention.

All approved foster and kinship carers supported by new services will have access to brokerage. All approved foster and kinship carers are eligible to receive the extracurricular boost, this includes: 

Flexible brokerage supports 

 Newly re-commissioned family-based care services have introduced flexible brokerage supports for all prospective and approved foster and kinship carers. All services are planned to be transitioned by 1 January 2027.

 Under new service types all approved foster and kinship carers will have access to brokerage funding held by their respective foster or kinship care support service.

 Brokerage support can be used to directly pay for goods and services on behalf of carer  household and be prioritised for use to meet immediate need present in carer’s home.

 Professional Foster Care Pilot

 The pilot is providing carers with access to an enhanced $100,000 per annum care allowance. This allowance recognises the professional and intensive nature of caring for children and

young people with disability and complex support needs, including the significant time, skill and commitment required.

Other financial support 

 All foster and kinship carers receive a $1,500 Extracurricular Support Payment with $750 paid twice each year, in January and July, for every eligible child or young person in their care tosupport participation in sport, recreation, cultural and other extracurricular activities.  

This is additional to Queensland’s care allowances paid fortnightly which include: The Fortnightly Care Allowance (FCA). The amount of this guaranteed reimbursement is dependent on the age of the child in their care, ranging from $652.40 a fortnight for a child five and under to $763.98 a fortnight for children aged 11 and over.

 Additional carer allowances, including the High Support Needs Allowance (HSNA) and the Complex Support Needs Allowances (CSNA) are also available to the carer for additional direct care costs beyond the general foster carer allowance. These allowances combined to increases the allowance paid per fortnight to $882.14 to $1,885.10 a fortnight. Please note, there is no change to these allowances in the 2026-27 budget and allowance indexed each January in line with annual September CPI changes for Brisbane.

Whether the department has undertaken any assessment of the actual costs incurred by foster and kinship carers relative to current allowance rates, including by age of child and placement type; Whether that assessment will be published; and whether further reforms to foster and kinship carer financial support are being considered to improve carer recruitment and retention.

 Allocation of additional allowances including HSNA and CSNA is based on the assessed need of individual care arrangements. This is considered as part of case planning and placement agreement discussion with the carers.

 There is no difference in eligibility of allowance types (FCA/HSNA/CSNA) or brokerage funding unit rates between approved foster or kinship carers.

Disability Royal Commission implementation

Q. With reference to the Department of Families, Seniors, Disability Services and Child Safety Service Delivery Statement (p.8), which states that in 2026–27 the Department will continue to progress disability reforms arising from the Royal Commission into Violence, Abuse, Neglect and Exploitation of People with Disability and the independent review of the NDIS, including Foundational Supports, in partnership with people with disability, their families and sector stakeholders—Will the Minister advise;

a) which Disability Royal Commission recommendations within the Minister’s portfolio remain outstanding,

b) which of those recommendations are intended to be progressed during 2026–27,

c) what funding has been allocated to progress those recommendations in 2026–27 and across the forward estimates,

d) how people with disability, their families, disability peak bodies and advocacy organisations will be involved in implementation oversight, and

e) how implementation progress will be publicly reported.

The voice of Queenslanders with disability is essential to ensuring reform delivers an inclusive and accessible Queensland. The Queensland Government is implementing disability reform, including recommendations arising from the DRC, in partnership with people with disability, their families and sector stakeholders.

The Queensland Government remains committed to implementing the recommendations of the Royal Commission into Violence, Abuse, Neglect and Exploitation of People with Disability (Disability Royal Commission, DRC). Of the 222 recommendations in the DRC’s Final Report, 130 were directed to the Queensland Government. Of those, 46 were directed to states and territories, including Queensland, and 84 were directed to states and territories jointly with the Commonwealth Government.

The Queensland Government’s response to the DRC, sets out the Queensland Government’s refreshed commitments to disability policy and reform. Of the 130 recommendations directed to the Queensland Government, 103 were accepted in full, in part or in principle.

The Disability Royal Commission 2025 Progress Report, published in November 2025, provides an update on progress against all 222 DRC recommendations.

 Implementation of DRC recommendations is managed across a range of Queensland Government agencies, with funding sought as required.

 The Queensland Government is working with the Commonwealth, State and Territory Governments to develop the 2026 DRC Progress Report. The 2026 reporting process is underpinned by the DRC National Reporting and Monitoring Framework, which was agreed by Disability Reform Ministerial Council on 19 June 2026.

Aged and disability infrastructure officers

Q. With reference to the Department of Families, Seniors, Disability Services and Child Safety Service Delivery Statement (p.1), which states the Department will continue to ensure government policies, programs and services are age friendly and support people to participate as vital members of the community— Will the Minister advise;

a) whether the Department has undertaken any assessment of the benefits of providing funding to local governments to employ specialist aged and disability infrastructure and accessibility officers,

b) whether the Department has assessed local government capability and resourcing to plan for ageing populations and people living with disability,

c) how local infrastructure and accessibility needs are currently identified and prioritised, including in high-growth and ageing communities such as the Noosa Electorate,

d) whether the Department has undertaken any statewide or regional analysis of unmet accessibility infrastructure needs, and

e) whether the Government is considering any future funding model to assist local governments to improve accessibility and age-friendly infrastructure.

Local governments are generally responsible for planning and providing local infrastructure within their respective local government areas. Questions about funding options for councils for aged and disability infrastructure should be referred to the Honourable Ann Leahy MP, Minister for Local Government and Water and Minister for Fire, Disaster Recovery and Volunteers.

 In relation to funding available to local governments for improved infrastructure, the Department of Local Government, Water and Volunteers administers a number of grant programs for Local Governments to assist in the delivery of infrastructure projects. This matter should be raised directly with Minister Leahy.

 DFSDSCS has contributed to the Disability Inclusion Guide, as developed by the Australian Local Government Association (ALGA). The guide reflects key principles under Australia’s Disability Strategy 2021-2031 and provides guidance about embedding good disability inclusive practice, including through disability inclusion action plans; and incorporating universal design into new and upgraded public spaces.

 In relation to the questions regarding identifying accessibility needs and whether the DFSDSCS has undertaken any statewide or regional analysis of unmet accessibility Infrastructure, the Department of State Development, Infrastructure and Planning is responsible for land use and infrastructure planning at a regional level. Ms Bolton may wish to raise these questions directly with the Honourable Jarrod Bleijie MP, Deputy Premier, Minister for State Development, Infrastructure and Planning and Minister for Industrial Relations for consideration when undertaking Regional Plan and Regional Infrastructure Plan reviews.

Seniors driver licence concession

Q. With reference to the Department of Families, Seniors, Disability Services and Child Safety Service Delivery Statement (p.1), which states the Department will continue supporting Queensland seniors to live active, healthy lives, deliver cost-of-living relief through the Seniors Card scheme, and ensure government policies, programs and services are age friendly— Will the Minister advise;

a) whether the Department has undertaken any assessment of providing a concession on Queensland driver licence fees for Seniors Card holders,

b) whether the Department has consulted with Queensland Treasury and the Department of Transport and Main Roads regarding such a proposal,

c) if an assessment has been undertaken, the estimated number of Queensland seniors who would be eligible and the estimated annual cost,

d) whether the Department has provided advice to Government on additional cost-of-living measures for seniors, and

e) what additional cost-of-living initiatives for seniors are currently being progressed by the Department.

Queensland Seniors Card holders currently benefit from a wide range of concessions and rebates including discounts on power, water, medical, recreation and transport. While Driver’s Licence fees are not discounted, Seniors Card holders receive a 50 per cent reduction on vehicle registration fees. In 2026-27, the Queensland Government allocated $393.24 million to concessions and rebates, providing significant cost of living relief for Queenslanders.

Elder Abuse Inquiry implementation

Q. With reference to the Department of Families, Seniors, Disability Services and Child Safety Service Delivery Statement (p.1), which states the Department will implement the recommendations of the Queensland Parliamentary Inquiry into Elder Abuse— Will the Minister advise;

a) which recommendations within the Minister’s portfolio will be progressed during 2026–27,

b) what funding has been allocated in 2026–27 and across the forward estimates to implement each recommendation,

c) the anticipated implementation timetable for recommendations that remain outstanding,

d) what performance measures or outcomes will be used to assess implementation, and

e) how older Queenslanders, carers and stakeholder organisations will be involved in monitoring and evaluating implementation.

The Queensland Government is committed to addressing elder abuse in Queensland and commenced the Inquiry into elder abuse in Queensland (the Inquiry) within 100 days of forming government.

The Committee tabled the Inquiry’s report on 12 December 2025, making 16 recommendations aligned with the key themes raised throughout the Inquiry: advocating for consistent and collective national reform; strengthening support and services for victims; age friendly and inclusive communities; addressing the misuse of enduring power of attorney legislation; and adult safeguarding for adults with care and support needs.

The Queensland Government has responded to the Inquiry’s report and work is now underway to deliver on this response. In relation to recommendations under my portfolio responsibilities, recommendations 2 and 6 are supported and implementation is underway. Other recommendations within my portfolio are being considered further.

 Older Queenslanders, carers, and stakeholder organisations will play a crucial role in monitoring and evaluating the implementation of recommendations. Their involvement will be facilitated through ongoing consultation and feedback mechanisms to ensure their perspectives and lived experiences inform the effectiveness of implemented recommendations and measures.

Minister for Natural Resources and Mines, Minister for Manufacturing and Minister for Regional and Rural Development

Coal Seam Gas subsidence impact assessment

Q. With reference to the Department of Natural Resources and Mines, Manufacturing and Regional and Rural Development Service Delivery Statement (p. 1), which states that the Department regulates Queensland’s petroleum and gas resources and manages the sustainable use of the State’s natural resources— Will the Minister advise;

a) whether the Department has undertaken or commissioned any assessment of the environmental or agricultural impacts associated with historical or current coal seam gas-related land subsidence,

b) whether any funding has been allocated from existing departmental resources in 2026–27 for monitoring, investigation or rehabilitation associated with coal seam gas-related subsidence,

c) which regions, land systems or petroleum tenure areas are currently subject to monitoring for subsidence impacts,

d) whether the Department has recommended additional funding through future Budget processes to undertake broader environmental or agricultural impact assessments, and

e) whether the findings of any completed assessments will be publicly released.

a) I have been advised that NRMMRRD commissioned a two-phase pilot study in the Condamine Alluvium area. Phase 1 of the project included an assessment of available data by the Office of Groundwater Impact Assessment (OGIA) and prediction of landform changes from existing and proposed CSG development at two pilot farms in the Condamine Alluvium area. For Phase 2, the Department of Primary Industries (DPI) undertook an agronomic and economic assessment of impacts from CSG-induced subsidence on the same pilot farms. DPI’s work was to develop and test tools, techniques and methods to better understand CSG-induced subsidence at a farm-field scale.

Potential impacts to environmental values from CSG-induced subsidence are assessed as part of the Underground Water Impact Report (UWIR) for the Surat Cumulative Management Area (Surat CMA) prepared by OGIA under Chapter 3 of the Water Act 2000, administered by the Department of the Environment, Tourism, Science and Innovation. A copy of the UWIR is available here.

 b)  I have been advised that NRMMRRD has not allocated funding from its 2026-27 budget for monitoring, investigation or rehabilitation associated with CSG-related subsidence.

However, Recommendation 4 of the Primary Industries and Resources Committee’s report on the Regional Planning Interests (Condamine Alluvium) and Other Legislation Amendment Bill 2026, was that the government consider allocating additional resources to OGIA to facilitate generating more granular data about CSG-induced subsidence in the Condamine Alluvium area.

Government supported this recommendation and is giving consideration to a broader role for the OGIA, having regard to relevant legal and policy matters, consultation with relevant stakeholders and potential funding models.

 c)  Regional scale ground motion and landform changes in the Surat CMA are monitored through a monitoring strategy stipulated in the UWIR. The Surat CMA covers the Surat and southern Bowen basins, where the majority of CSG activities occur. For a map showing the area of the Surat CMA please see ‘Figure 1-2: The Surat CMA’ at page 6 of the 2025 UWIR.

Remote sensing and airborne survey technologies are used to monitor ground motion and landform changes in the Surat CMA, including Interferometric Synthetic Aperture Radar and Light Detection and Ranging data. This data is used to make predictions of regional-scale cumulative subsidence for the area.

 d) The Queensland Government is giving consideration to a broader role for the OGIA, including funding models, as noted in the response to question (b).

 e) Publications and reports by the OGIA, including UWIRs, are publicly available. 

It is expected that DPI and OGIA will make information from the pilot project to assess agricultural impacts associated with CSG-induced subsidence in the Condamine Alluvium area publicly available once completed. If you require further information about Phase 1 or Phase 2 of the pilot project, please contact the Office of the Honourable Tony Perrett MP, Minister for Primary Industries on telephone 3719 7530 or via email at primaryindustries@ministerial.qld.gov.au.

Community Benefit Agreements and Key Resource Areas

Q. With reference to the Department of Natural Resources and Mines, Manufacturing and Regional and Rural Development Service Delivery Statement (p. 1), which states that the Department will enable industries, stakeholders and customers to build resilient and thriving regional and rural communities – Will the Minister advise;

a) whether the Government has assessed the applicability of Community Benefit Agreements or similar mechanisms to other large-scale developments, including mining, quarrying, extractive industries and projects within Key Resource Areas;

b) what criteria or evidence the Government has used to determine which industries should be subject to Community Benefit Agreement requirements;

c) whether the Government is considering extending Community Benefit Agreement requirements, or similar community benefit mechanisms, to other medium to large-scale resource or industrial developments; and

d) whether the Government will review existing mining, quarrying and other major resource developments to assess whether they are delivering resilient and thriving regional communities, and if so, what measures or indicators will be used to undertake that assessment?

The Community Benefit system is administered by the Department of State Development, Infrastructure and Planning and has two core components: social impact assessment, and a community benefit agreement. The onus is on proponents of prescribed developments to conduct social impact assessments and enter into community benefit agreements with local government before lodging development applications. The planning regulation prescribes wind farms, solar farms and battery storage facilities. This process was implemented to ensure that those types of developments received the same treatment as other major projects (such as mines) that are required to undergo analysis of social, community, environmental impact assessments to obtain environmental approvals and mining or extraction licences.

The existing approvals system under planning legislation and regulations, environmental and mining legislation already provides for protection of the environment and social and community values. At this point in time, the Queensland Government has no requirement to extend Social Impact Assessment and Community Benefit Agreements to large-scale developments within key resource areas or other industries.

Attorney-General; Minister for Justice and Minister for Integrity

Maroochydore Courthouse Domestic and Family Violence capability

Q. With reference to the 2026–27 Capital Statement (p.48), which provides $24.9 million to complete domestic and family violence courthouse improvements at Maroochydore— Will the Attorney-General advise a) the total estimated project cost and the funding allocated in 2026–27;

b) the works to be delivered, including any safe rooms, security upgrades, accessibility improvements and victim support facilities;

c) whether the completed upgrades will enable or support the operation of Maroochydore as a full-service Domestic and Family Violence Court servicing the Sunshine Coast and Noosa region;

d) the expected project completion and implementation timetable; and

e) whether any additional judicial officers, registry staff or support services will be provided following completion of the upgrades.

                We will update once a response has been received.

Electoral Act reform

Q. With reference to Department of Justice’s Service Delivery Statement (p. 62) which outlined the Electoral Commission of Queensland’s responsibility to deliver accessible, fair and transparent electoral services all Queenslanders— Will the Attorney-General advise;

a) whether the Government intends to introduce amendments to the Electoral Act 1992 during 2026–27,

b) whether any proposed reforms will consider postal vote handling arrangements, transparency of how-to-vote and preference recommendation material, and other electoral integrity measures,

c) when stakeholder and public consultation on any proposed reforms is expected to commence, and

d) the anticipated timeframe for the introduction of any legislation?

We will update once a response has been received.

Community legal services

Q. With reference to the 2026–27 Budget Measures (p.16-17), which provide an additional $8.6 million for Legal Aid Queensland and $1.4 million for the Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Legal Service to improve access to justice, and the Department of Justice’s Service Delivery Statement (p. 25), which commits to partnering with community legal centres to help ensure quality services, innovating to maximise the reach of services to rural and regional communities, and leading policy on issues affecting our service delivery and engaging collaboratively with service providers— Will the Attorney-General advise;

a) the total State funding allocated to community legal services in 2026–27, reported by provider and region,

b) the amount allocated to community legal service providers servicing the Sunshine Coast and Noosa region,

c) the number of clients who were unable to receive assistance due to capacity constraints during 2025–26, reported by provider and legal assistance category,

d) whether the Government has assessed unmet legal need in Sunshine Coast communities including Noosa, and

e) whether additional investment in community legal services will be considered during the forward estimates to address identified unmet demand?

We will update once a response has been received.

Right to Information reform

Q. With reference to the Department of Justice’s Service Delivery Statement (p. 32-33) which outlines the Office of the Information Commissioner’s commitment to promote the adoption of proactive access to government-held information, drive government transparency, and continue implementing reforms under the Right to Information Act 2009— Will the Attorney-General advise;

a) whether the Government intends to undertake a further review of the Right to Information Act 2009 during 2026–27,

b) whether stronger proactive disclosure obligations for government agencies are being considered,

c) whether any additional resourcing has been allocated to reduce delays in external reviews conducted by the Office of the Information Commissioner, and

d) whether the Government will review the current performance framework for Right to Information processing, including agency processing timeframes and external review targets?

We will update once a response has been received.

Gambling Reform

Q. With reference to the Department of Justice Service Delivery Statement (p.1), which commits to minimising gambling harm through prevention and early intervention, including raising community awareness of gambling risks and promoting support tools and resources— Will the Attorney-General advise;

a) whether the Government considers the acceptance of political donations from gambling and wagering entities to be consistent with its objective of minimising gambling harm,

b) whether the Government will consider prohibiting political donations from gambling and wagering entities,

c) whether the Government has assessed the impact of gambling and wagering advertising on State Government-owned or controlled assets, infrastructure and public spaces on gambling harm,

d) whether the Government will consider ending gambling and wagering advertising on State Government-owned or controlled assets, infrastructure and public spaces, and

e) whether any whole-of-government review is underway regarding the role of gambling advertising in contributing to gambling harm.

We will update once a response has been received.

Safe Night Precinct

Q. With reference to the Department of Justice Service Delivery Statement (p.1), which states that the Department administers Queensland’s liquor laws and works to minimise alcohol-related harm through a safe, responsible and regulated liquor industry— Will the Minister advise;

a) the current status of the Safe Night Precinct proposal for Noosa,

b) what changes, if any, have been made to the model in response to feedback from Noosa Shire Council, local businesses, licensed venues, residents and other stakeholders,

c) whether any further consultation has been undertaken since the initial stakeholder engagement and, if so, with whom, and

d) whether the Government intends to proceed with a Safe Night Precinct in Noosa and, if so, the format and  anticipated implementation timeframe?

We will update once a response has been received.

Deputy Premier; Minister for State Development, Infrastructure and Planning and Minister for Industrial Relations

Planning Act protections and Short-Term Accommodation

Q. With reference to the Department of State Development, Infrastructure and Planning Service Delivery Statement (p. 7), which states that the Department administers the Planning Act 2016 and is simplifying Queensland’s land use planning and development assessment processes with a specific focus on delivering more homes for Queenslanders— Will the Deputy Premier advise;

a) whether the Government will review sections 260 and 31 of the Planning Act 2016 as they relate to existing lawful uses and compensation claims,

b) whether any review will consider circumstances where short-term accommodation is not ancillary to use of the premises as a principal place of residence,

c) whether housing pressures in high-demand communities such as Noosa will be specifically considered, and

d) the expected timeframe for any proposed reforms?

We will update once a response has been received.

State Planning Policy review and housing affordability

Q. With reference to the Department of State Development, Infrastructure and Planning’s Service Delivery Statement (p. 7), which states that the Department will drive an effective and efficient planning system through a flexible planning framework, fast-tracked planning decisions to increase housing supply, and simplify the state’s land use planning and development assessment processes to deliver more homes for Queenslanders— Will the Deputy Premier advise;

a) the scope and timing of any State Planning Policy review or review of SARA referral triggers in 2026–27,

b) whether housing affordability, key worker housing, transitional and temporary housing, i.e. transportable and caravan parks, and short-term accommodation impacts are included in scope,

c) how local governments and communities experiencing acute housing stress, including Noosa, will be consulted, and

d) when draft changes will be released for public feedback?

We will update once a response has been received.

Residential Activation Fund and affordable housing outcomes

Q. With reference to the $2 billion Residential Activation Fund for trunk and essential infrastructure to activate new residential developments (Budget Paper 3, p. 99)— Will the Deputy Premier advise;

a) the projects approved or under assessment by region, local government area and funding amount,

b) whether any projects are located in or directly benefit the Noosa Electorate,

c) whether funding agreements include requirements or incentives for affordable housing, key worker housing or public value outcomes, and

d) how the Government will measure whether the fund improves housing affordability as well as housing supply?

We will update once a response has been received.

Sunshine Coast athlete village and regional legacy

Q. With reference to the Department of Sport, Racing and Olympic and Paralympic Games Service Delivery Statement (p. 2), which provides $3.5 billion for the Athlete Villages program, including the delivery of athlete villages in Brisbane, the Gold Coast, the Sunshine Coast and Rockhampton— Will the Deputy Premier advise;

a) the current planned location, scope and delivery model for the Sunshine Coast Athlete Village,

b) the expected number and type of dwellings to be delivered, including whether they will be built to a code equivalent to permanent accommodations post-games

c) the proportion of  post-Games use dedicated to affordable, key worker, social or community housing, and

d) what consultation has occurred with Sunshine Coast and Noosa stakeholders regarding legacy housing outcomes?

We will update once a response has been received.

Minister for Customer Services and Open Data and Minister for Small and Family Business

Proactive release of government administrative data

Q. With reference to the Department of Customer Services, Open Data and Small and Family Business Service Delivery Statement (p.1), which states that the Department will transform government services through cross agency leadership and secure operating environments and services and contribute to Government objectives through data and digital initiatives— Will the Minister advise;

a) which government datasets have been prioritised for proactive publication or enhancement during 2026–27,

(b) whether these priorities include datasets relating to national park funding, service delivery performance, crime statistics, compliance activities and other high-value public datasets, (c) what implementation timetable applies to improving proactive disclosure practices across government agencies, (d) whether agencies have been provided with guidance or targets for increasing proactive publication of administrative information, and (e) how the Government will measure and publicly report on improvements in proactive disclosure and open data availability.

We will update once a response has been received.

Cross-agency information sharing

Q. With reference to the Department of Customer Services, Open Data and Small and Family Business Service Delivery Statement (p.1), which includes the strategic objective to “transform government services through cross agency leadership and secure operating environments and services”, and Budget Paper 4 (p.93), which provides funding for digital government initiatives including the Queensland Digital Licence Application and Service Portal, Maintain and Enhance the Queensland Digital Identity, and the Cyber Security and Technology Fund— Will the Minister advise;

a) whether the Government has developed a whole-of-government strategy and implementation timetable to improve digital capability and real-time information sharing between government agencies, including the Queensland Police Service, Maritime Safety Queensland and the Queensland Parks and Wildlife Service,

b) what legislative, operational or technological barriers remain to achieving interoperable information-sharing systems across agencies,

c) what assessments have been undertaken to identify agencies or business areas requiring ICT improvements and the priority order for implementation, and

d) the projected timetable for rolling out those improvements.

We will update once a response has been received.

Small business digital services

Q. With reference to the Department of Customer Services, Open Data and Small and Family Business Service Delivery Statement (pp.1–2), which states the Department will create the right settings for small and family businesses to succeed, introduce simplified contracts, streamlined processes and smaller tenders aligned with the Queensland Procurement Policy 2026, and support red tape reduction through collaborative engagement across government— Will the Minister advise;

a) what digital services, online platforms and customer service improvements will be delivered for Queensland small and family businesses during 2026–27,

b) whether businesses in regional communities, including the Noosa Electorate, have been consulted in the design or prioritisation of these improvements,

c) how the Department will measure service performance and customer satisfaction for these initiatives,

d) what digital reforms are being implemented during 2026–27 to reduce regulatory burden for small and family businesses, and

e) what additional digital or regulatory reforms are currently under consideration.

We will update once a response has been received.

Government administrative data quality

Q. With reference to the Department of Customer Services, Open Data and Small and Family Business Service Delivery Statement (p.1), which states the Department will transform government services through cross agency leadership and secure operating environments and services, and contribute to the Government’s objectives through data and digital initiatives— Will the Minister advise;

a) what governance arrangements are in place to ensure administrative datasets published through the Queensland Open Data Portal remain accurate, complete and current,

b) whether agencies are subject to minimum data publication or data quality standards,

c) how compliance with those standards is monitored and reported,

d) whether agency performance relating to proactive publication and data quality is publicly reported, and

e) whether the Government intends to introduce whole-of-government performance measures or reporting requirements for the timely publication and maintenance of administrative datasets.

We will update once a response has been received.

Small Business First implementation

Q. With reference to the Department of Customer Services, Open Data and Small and Family Business Service Delivery Statement (pp.1–2), which states the Department will create the right settings for small and family businesses to succeed, introduce simplified contracts, streamlined processes and smaller tenders aligned with the Queensland Procurement Policy 2026, and support red tape reduction through collaborative engagement across government— Will the Minister advise;

a) which Small Business First initiatives remain under active implementation during 2026–27,

b) what measurable reductions in regulatory burden are expected from those initiatives,

c) whether additional reforms relating to licensing, approvals or digital transactions are currently being developed,

d) how progress against the Small Business First agenda will be publicly reported, and

e) whether further regulatory reform measures are being considered during the forward estimates.

We will update once a response has been received.

Minister for Education and the Arts

Specialist Disability Support in Schools

Q. With reference to the Department of Education Service Delivery Statement (p.2), which commits to continuing professional development for teachers under the More Teachers, Better Education initiative to support students living with disability and diverse learning needs— Will the Minister advise;

a) the current status of the review of the Specialist Disability Support in Schools program,

b) whether the review has recommended any changes to the program’s eligibility, service delivery model or resourcing,

c) how many students are currently awaiting access to the Specialist Disability Support in Schools program, reported by region,

d) whether any changes to the program are expected to be implemented during 2026–27, and (e) what additional initiatives, if any, will be delivered during 2026–27 to improve curriculum access and participation for students with disability in the Noosa Electorate.

We will update once a response has been received.

School infrastructure

Q. With reference to the Department of Education Service Delivery Statement (p.8), which outlines the 2026–27 education capital program, including $276.3 million to upgrade or provide additional school and early childhood education infrastructure, and Budget Paper 3: Capital Statement (pp.30–31), which includes funding for School playground and tuckshop upgrades and the Sunshine Beach State High School fire hydrant upgrade— Will the Minister advise;

a) whether construction funding has been allocated in 2026–27 or the forward estimates for the proposed Sunshine Beach State High School Advanced Manufacturing Hub,

b) if not, whether the project remains under active consideration,

c) whether funding for the school playground and tuckshop upgrades program has increased compared with 2025–26 and whether Sunshine Beach State High School is eligible to apply,

d) whether the Department has reviewed the eligibility criteria that resulted in schools missing out under previous tuckshop upgrade funding rounds, and

e) what capital works, maintenance or renewal projects are funded for schools within the Noosa Electorate over the forward estimates.

We will update once a response has been received.

 School Safety

Q. With reference to the Department of Education Service Delivery Statement (p.8), which provides $62 million in 2026–27 for infrastructure works to meet legislative obligations and safety requirements, and Budget Paper 3: Capital Statement (pp.30–31), which includes the School Security Program with a minimum of $5 million for school security fencing— Will the Minister advise;

a) the criteria used to prioritise schools for security fencing funding,

b) which schools will receive security fencing funding during 2026–27, reported by region,

c) whether Noosa District State High School (Pomona Campus) and Tewantin State School were assessed for funding under the School Security Program,

d) whether updated security or risk assessments have been undertaken for those schools since 1 July 2025, and

e) what alternative funding pathways are available where a school has documented safety concerns or repeated vandalism but does not meet the threshold for priority funding under the School Security Program.

We will update once a response has been received.

Disengaged students

Q. With reference to the Department of Education Service Delivery Statement (p.1), which states the Department will support early intervention to keep young people engaged in learning and continue to implement Brighter futures: Delivering excellence in every state school, for every student (p.2)— Will the Minister advise;

a) the number of referrals made by state schools for students to access Flexi Schools, Special Assistance Schools or other alternative education settings in each year from 2022–23 to 2025–26;

b) the average and longest waiting time for students to access those settings, reported by region;

c) whether the Department has assessed whether lengthy waiting lists or limited capacity are discouraging schools from referring eligible students to alternative education settings;

d) whether the Department has identified unmet demand for Flexi School or alternative education placements on the Sunshine Coast, including within the Noosa Electorate; and

e) whether any additional capacity or initiatives are planned during 2026–27 to reduce waiting times or address unmet demand for alternative education placements.

We will update once a response has been received.

Minister for Finance, Trade, Employment and Training

Former Tewantin TAFE site proceeds

Q. With reference to the Department of Trade, Employment and Training Service Delivery Statement (p. 6), which provides a $90.3 million capital program for 2026–27, including investment in new TAFE Centres of Excellence and training infrastructure— Will the Minister advise;

a) the total gross proceeds received from the sale or disposal of the former Tewantin TAFE campus,

b) how those proceeds have been allocated or applied within the State Budget,

c) whether any of those proceeds have been reinvested in education, vocational training or TAFE infrastructure within the Noosa electorate,

d) whether the Department or Queensland Treasury considered quarantining the proceeds for reinvestment in education or training infrastructure such as a Learning Hub within the Noosa electorate, and

e) if not, why not?

f) whether consultation has occurred with Noosa Council, TAFE Queensland, local schools, Chambers of Commerce and industry regarding.

The Minister did not address these questions

Regional workforce education and training

With reference to the Department of Trade, Employment and Training Service Delivery Statement (p. 1), which commits to investing in training for the skilled workforce Queensland needs, expanding access to training, and investing in modern training facilities to support industry and regional workforce demand— Will the Minister advise;

a) what education, training and workforce development programs are funded in 2026–27 to address regional workforce shortages,

b) which of these programs are available to residents of the Noosa electorate, including through locally delivered, blended or online training,

c) whether the Department has undertaken any assessment of current or projected workforce shortages in the Noosa electorate across key industries including health, aged care, disability services, hospitality, tourism, construction, manufacturing and education,

d) whether additional locally delivered or flexible training opportunities are being considered to address identified workforce needs in the Noosa region, and (e) what performance measures will be used to evaluate whether these investments are improving workforce participation, skills availability and regional workforce shortages.

a) With regards to regional workforce education and training, The Right Skills Strategy 2025- 2028 ensures that all Queenslanders have access to training opportunities in their communities, with a focus on meeting workforce demands and addressing critical skills gaps. The strategy also establishes success measures aligned with the national Vocational Education and Training (VET) Outcomes Framework. These measures include aligning skills training with workforce demand, enabling Queenslanders to develop the skills needed for employment, and ensuring that learning supports and pathways are accessible and effective.

b) The Crisafulli Government is funding a range of education, training, and workforce development programs to address workforce shortages. One such initiative is the Reboot Your Trade Training program, delivered by TAFE Queensland, which supports up to 720 cancelled apprentices in high-demand industries. Following a successful pilot in South-East Queensland, the program will expand statewide from July 2026, including delivery at the Nambour campus. This expansion will provide flexible training and tailored support to help apprentices reconnect with their training and resume their careers.

Another key initiative being delivered by the Crisafulli Government is the TAE Support Package for Students delivered by TAFE Queensland and CQUniversity, which addresses critical skills shortages in the VET sector. This program supports students undertaking the Certificate IV in Training and Assessment (TAE40122), a mandatory qualification for VET trainers and assessors.

c) The Anticipating Future Skills Series, an ongoing initiative by Jobs Queensland, provides detailed employment projections for Queensland by region, industry, occupation, and qualification level. For example, by 2028–29, health care and social assistance is expected to remain the Sunshine Coast’s largest and fastest-growing industry, employing 20% of the regional workforce. While growth in the construction sector is anticipated to slow, it is still projected to be the second-largest industry, with strong employment in retail trade and accommodation reflecting the Sunshine Coast’s vital role as a key tourism destination.

e) The Department’s annual Training Priorities Plan outlines investment priorities to address workforce needs, align with local and national training goals, and tackle critical skills shortages. The plan also includes targets for key indicators such as employer and student satisfaction with training and the proportion of VET graduates in employment or further study.

Minister for Housing and Public Works and Minister for Youth

Social housing eligibility thresholds

Q. With reference to the Department of Housing and Public Works Service Delivery Statement (p.2), which provides $1.024 billion over five years from 2025–26 to support delivery of 53,500 social and community homes by 2044, and $83.4 million over three years to continue private rental market tenancy support programs— Will the Minister advise;

a) what data and measures the Government uses to assess housing need and housing stress for people who are ineligible for social housing;

b) whether the Government has assessed the impact of social housing income eligibility thresholds in high-cost housing markets, including the Noosa electorate;

c) how many households were assessed as ineligible for social housing because their income exceeded eligibility thresholds during 2025–26, despite experiencing housing stress or being unable to secure affordable housing;

d) what temporary, transitional or other housing options are funded in 2026–27 for households experiencing housing stress who are ineligible for social housing; and

e) whether the Government intends to review social housing eligibility settings or develop additional housing assistance pathways for households who fall outside current eligibility criteria but remain unable to access affordable housing

f) whether government will under disaster provisions activate sites for caravans/demountable/tiny homes parks to provide temporary accommodations until the housing crisis has been addressed?

We will update once a response has been received.

Affordable housing outcomes from Doonella Street and Lake Macdonald

Q. With reference to the Sunshine Coast Regional Budget Statement (p.3), which provides $4.2 million over three years for the Cooroy community housing development, and the Department of Housing and Public Works Service Delivery Statement (p.2), which commits $1.024 billion over five years from 2025–26 to support delivery of 53,500 social and community homes by 2044— Will the Minister advise;

a) whether any dwellings not required to meet existing Noosa electorate residents’ social housing demand may be allocated through an affordable housing model for low-income workers who marginally exceed current social housing eligibility thresholds,

b) whether the Department has assessed this need due to outdated social housing eligibility thresholds

c) what policy, legislative or funding barriers currently prevent this model, and

d) whether the Government will consider a pilot affordable housing allocation model for workforce-critical communities?

We will update once a response has been received.

 Under-occupied public housing

Q. With reference to the Department of Housing and Public Works Service Delivery Statement (p.4), which reports that 15% of government-owned and managed social rental housing was under-occupied in 2025–26, with a 2026–27 target of 15%— Will the Minister advise;

a) whether the Department has assessed downsizing incentives or other approaches used in other jurisdictions to better match household size with dwelling size,

b) how many government-owned and managed social rental housing dwellings are currently under-occupied, reported by region and bedroom number,

c) how many larger dwellings could potentially become available for families under alternative voluntary transfer or allocation models,

d) what incentives currently exist to encourage voluntary downsizing, and

e) whether any reforms to improve utilisation of existing public housing stock were considered during the 2026–27 Budget process?

We will update once a response has been received.

Specialist homelessness services and Noosa

Q. With reference to the Department of Housing and Public Works Service Delivery Statement (p.2), which provides $450.1 million over four years from 2025–26 to deliver frontline housing and homelessness services across Queensland— Will the Minister advise;

a) the 2026–27 funding allocated to Specialist Homelessness Services operating within the Noosa Electorate,

b) the funding received by each provider,

c) whether unmet demand, turn-away and waiting list data are collected for Noosa, and

d) whether additional homelessness funding is being considered to address increasing housing demand within Noosa and broader Queensland?

We will update once a response has been received.

 Housing support for low-income workers

Q. With reference to the Department of Housing and Public Works Service Delivery Statement (p.2), which provides $83.4 million over three years from 2025–26 to continue private rental market tenancy support programs, and $1.024 billion over five years from 2025–26 to support delivery of 53,500 social and community homes by 2044— Will the Minister advise;

a) what programs specifically assist low-income workers who exceed current social housing eligibility thresholds,

b) whether the Department has assessed the number of households within this cohort across Queensland and within Noosa,

c) whether dedicated affordable housing programs for key workers were considered during the 2026–27 Budget process,

d) what further work is planned to address this cohort, including transitional and temporary housing sites such as the former campground at 60 Fellowship Drive Doonan, and

e) whether future Budget measures will specifically target workforce housing affordability?

We will update once a response has been received.

Noosa youth hub and youth services

With reference to the Department of Housing and Public Works Service Delivery Statement (p.1), which states the Department will deliver programs to engage and promote young Queenslanders, including YMCA Queensland Youth Parliament, the Queensland Indigenous Youth Leadership Program, Queensland Youth Week and Safer Schoolies initiatives— Will the Minister advise;

a) what youth services and youth engagement programs are funded in the Noosa Electorate for 2026–27,

b) whether any partner funding is available for a Noosa youth hub or associated youth services,

c) whether the Department has assessed youth service gaps in Noosa and

d) what engagement has occurred with Noosa Council and local providers, including Youturn?

We will update once a response has been received.

Minister for Local Government and Water, Minister for Fire, Disaster Recovery and Volunteers

Rural Fire Service Queensland station prioritisation

Q. With reference to the Queensland Fire Department 2026–27 Service Delivery Statement (p.5), which provides $9.2 million for the delivery of replacement or upgraded rural fire brigade stations across Queensland, and the Capital Statement (p.74) identifying funded station projects— Will the Minister advise;

a) the criteria used to prioritise replacement and upgraded rural fire brigade station projects,

b) the current condition rating, priority ranking or infrastructure assessment for the Tinbeerwah Rural Fire Brigade station,

c) whether volunteer numbers, response coverage, bushfire risk, asset condition and compliance with contemporary operational standards are considered when prioritising projects,

d) whether Tinbeerwah has been assessed for inclusion in future capital works programs and, if so, the outcome of that assessment, and

e) when the next tranche of rural fire brigade station replacement or upgrade projects will be determined?

We will update once a response has been received.

 Volunteers

Q. With reference to Budget Paper 4 (p.23), which provides $1.2 million over three years to deliver the first phase of the 10-year Volunteering Plan and progress the Government’s response to the Parliamentary Inquiry into Volunteering— Will the Minister advise;

a) which Inquiry recommendations will be progressed in 2026–27 and the funding allocated to each,

b) whether any of the $453,000 allocated in 2026–27 will address volunteer insurance, fuel, travel or other out-of-pocket costs,

c) which recommendations remain unfunded or under consideration,

d) whether options such as a statewide volunteer insurance scheme, volunteer fuel subsidy or other financial assistance were considered during the 2026–27 Budget process and, if so, the outcome, and

e) the implementation timetable for the remaining recommendations?

We will update once a response has been received.

Changes to Federal Government’s Disaster Recovery Funding Arrangements

Q. With reference to Budget Paper 2 (p. 84) stating that proposed changes to the Disaster Recovery Funding Arrangements, including a blanket 50:50 funding arrangement, would have cost the state around an extra $500 million each year on average to respond to recent events— Will the Minister advise;

a) what funding has been allocated in 2026–27 for disaster preparedness, response and recovery activities delivered by Queensland emergency services and the Queensland Reconstruction Authority,

b) whether the proposed Commonwealth cost-sharing changes have been incorporated into Queensland’s 2026–27 Budget and forward estimates,

c) what additional contribution Queensland would be required to provide over the forward estimates if the proposed arrangements proceed, and

d) what impact the proposed changes are expected to have on disaster preparedness, response capability, recovery operations and future investment in emergency service infrastructure, personnel and equipment?

We will update once a response has been received.

 Disaster resilience workforce and volunteer capability

Q. With reference to the Queensland Fire Department Service Delivery Statement (p.2), which states the department will implement the Queensland Fire Department’s Volunteerism Strategy 2026–2030, including providing effective communication and engagement, embedding a safety-first culture, ensuring efficient access to essential equipment, fostering continuous learning and development, and recognising volunteer contributions— Will the Minister advise;

a) which initiatives under the Volunteerism Strategy 2026–2030 will be delivered during 2026–27;

b) which of those initiatives will be delivered in the Sunshine Coast region, including the Noosa Electorate;

c) whether any additional support will be provided to volunteer emergency organisations operating within the Noosa Electorate as part of implementation of the Strategy;

d) whether the Department intends to introduce any additional performance measures to assess implementation of the Strategy beyond the published organisational engagement measure for Rural Fire Service Queensland volunteers; and

e) how volunteer emergency organisations will be involved in evaluating the implementation of the Strategy

We will update once a response has been received.

Minister for Police and Emergency Services

Illegal e-bike, e-scooter and e-motorbike enforcement

Q. With reference to the Department of Transport and Main Roads Service Delivery Statement (p. 2), which commits to implementing the new e-bike and e-scooter laws to strengthen accountability for riders, parents and suppliers following the passage of the Transport and Other Legislation (Managing E-mobility Use and Protecting Our Communities) Amendment Bill— Will the Minister advise;

a) how much operational funding in 2026–27 has been allocated specifically to support Queensland Police Service enforcement of illegal e-bikes, e-scooters and e-motorbikes,

b) how those enforcement resources will be distributed across police districts,

c) whether high-tourism active transport locations, including Noosa, will receive increased targeted enforcement activity,

d) what performance measures or key indicators will be used to assess the effectiveness of the new enforcement regime, and

e) whether infringement, vehicle seizure, crash and complaint data relating to illegal e-mobility devices will be publicly reported and, if so, how frequently?

We will update once a response has been received.

Black Spot Eradication Trial

Q. With reference to the Queensland Police Service’s Service Delivery Statement (pp. 1–2), which commits to enhancing community and police safety through improvements in law enforcement capability, including a $5.4 million investment over three years in drone and surveillance technology capable of rapid launch and operation in difficult terrain— Will the Minister advise;

a) the locations selected for the Black Spot Eradication Trial,

b) the criteria used to determine those locations,

c) whether Noosa North Shore, Teewah Beach or the Cooloola Recreation Area were assessed for inclusion and, if not, why not,

d) whether additional communications capability or black spot mitigation initiatives are planned for the North Coast Police Region during 2026–27, and

e) how the trial will be evaluated, including the performance measures that will inform any future expansion.

We will update once a response has been received.

Sunshine Coast Police District operational capacity

Q. With reference to the Queensland Police Service’s Service Delivery Statement (p. 1), which commits to maintaining high-visibility policing, targeted enforcement and strong community engagement to deter dangerous behaviour and reinforce safer choices, and to developing a QPS Demand Management Framework to strengthen workforce planning and sustainable service delivery— Will the Minister advise;

a) the authorised establishment, funded establishment, actual full-time equivalent staffing, attrition rate and average leave rate for the Sunshine Coast Police District for 2024–25, 2025–26 and the 2026–27 budgeted establishment,

b) the overtime budget and actual overtime expenditure for the Sunshine Coast Police District for 2024–25, 2025–26 and the 2026–27 budget allocation,

c) whether additional operational resources are allocated to the Noosa Patrol Group or Sunshine Coast Police District and, if so, how those resources are determined,

d) how seasonal population increases are incorporated into police resource allocation decisions, and (e) whether additional permanent police or civilian positions are planned for the Sunshine Coast Police District during the forward estimates.

We will update once a response has been received.

Police and emergency services mental health

Q. With reference to the Queensland Police Service’s Service Delivery Statement (p. 5), which commits to developing and implementing a fatigue risk management framework tailored to QPS operations to enhance employee wellbeing and support safe, sustainable service delivery— Will the Minister advise;

a) what funding is allocated in 2026–27 for police mental health, fatigue and wellbeing initiatives, including any Copline-style services,

b) whether equivalent mental health and wellbeing supports are available to State Emergency Service, Marine Rescue Queensland and other emergency service personnel and volunteers,

c) whether the Government has assessed extending a dedicated Copline-style peer support service across emergency services,

d) what utilisation, satisfaction and outcome measures will be publicly reported, and

e) whether independent evaluation of these initiatives is planned?

We will update once a response has been received.

Minister for Primary Industries

Shark Control Program

Q. With reference to the Department of Primary Industries Service Delivery Statement (p.2), which commits to conducting scientific research into shark populations and delivering a strengthened Queensland Shark Control Program for the protection of Queensland beachgoers— Will the Minister advise;

a) what funding has been allocated in 2026–27 to assess, trial or implement alternatives to shark nets, including  expanded drone surveillance and other non-lethal shark mitigation technologies;

b) what alternative technologies or management approaches are currently being assessed and the timeframe for any trials or implementation;

c) whether Noosa beaches are being considered for trials of shark net alternatives or expanded shark drone operations, including seven-day monitoring, and if not, why not;

d) whether any shark net alternative trials or expanded drone operations are expected to commence before or during the 2026 whale migration season; and

e) how data collected through the Queensland SharkSmart Drone Trial and other monitoring programs will be used to assess the effectiveness of alternatives to shark nets and inform future shark management decisions.

a) $12.581 million has been allocated to research and trials of alternatives in 2026/27, including the SharkSmart drone program and the catch alert drumline trial in the Great Barrier Reef Marine Park (GBRMP). 

b) Alternatives currently in use or being trialled in Queensland include drones and catch alert drumlines.

The current funding arrangements for the SharkSmart drone program include funding for weekends, public holidays, and all Queensland school holidays, weather permitting. 

The priority for the investment and additional funding is to expand operations to a total of 21 beaches in 2026/27. Strategic placement of launch and retrieval zones allows drone coverage for neighbouring beaches, bringing the total number of beaches in the program to more than 30 in 2026/27. 

The SharkSmart drone program will continue to explore new technologies and strategies to improve the effectiveness of drones. I note that the Noosa Main Beach was the first site in Queensland to trial extended visual line-of-sight flights, which has enabled extended coverage to include both Noosa Main Beach and Noosa West. 

c) A trial of beyond visual line-of-sight operations is also in development, with Noosa under consideration as a trial location. Notably, approvals for these operations are more stringent than standard flights and need to be carefully planned and delivered in accordance with Civil Aviation Safety Authority requirements. This will also pave the way for trials of automated flights, which will allow for increased temporal coverage at existing drone program locations 

In addition to the regular drone services, we are funding drone monitoring for special events such as nipper carnivals, surf lifesaving, and surfing events. 

 The trial of catch alert drumlines in the GBRMP is expanding to cover additional beaches on the Capricorn Coast and to include Townsville as a new location in mid-2026. A full roll-out of catch alert drumlines and removal of existing traditional drumlines in the GBRMP by April 2027 is a requirement under the Commonwealth permit. 

As previously advised, a framework for the systematic identification, trial, and assessment of new technologies and management practices will be developed and implemented for the Program. Suitable sites for trials will be determined once the framework has been developed and alternatives suitable for trial have been identified. Your support for Noosa as a trial site for alternative technologies has been noted. 

The Queensland Government is committed to reducing the impact of the program on non-target species in so far as it does not interfere with the purpose of the program, to reduce the risk of shark attacks. 

d) DPI has also partnered with The University of Queensland to deliver a trial of modified acoustic whale alarms at Noosa during the 2026 southern whale migration period. The trial aims todetermine whether the modified alarms are effective at reducing the risk of whale entanglements in shark nets used in the Program. 

 e) Under the Queensland Shark Management Plan 2025-2029, a program monitoring framework to systematically assess performance will beestablished, including the development of key performance measures to monitor priority operations and program initiatives. Data collected as part of the SharkSmart drone program will be included in the framework. 

 As we have previously advised, the Program will continue to use shark nets and traditional drumlines until alternatives are proven effective at reducing the risk of shark attacks.

Feral pest management funding

Q. With reference to the Department of Primary Industries Service Delivery Statement (p.1), which states the Department will partner with local governments, primary producers, natural resource management groups and other stakeholders to develop and implement new regionally focused actions to manage feral pigs and wild dogs— Will the Minister advise;

a) what funding is available to local governments for feral pest management during 2026–27,

b) whether Noosa Shire Council is eligible to apply,

c) the funding allocated by local government area during 2025–26 and 2026–27,

d) whether future funding rounds will specifically support implementation of the Draft Queensland Feral Pig Management Action Plan, and

e) what reporting requirements apply to funded projects?

The Queensland Government supports addressing the impacts of feral pigs and wild dogs through investment in the Queensland Feral Pest Initiative (QFPI), which is administered through DPI.  

QFPI provides funding to assist rural industries and communities with invasive plant and animal management, which includes constructing cluster and exclusion fences to manage the impact of wild dogs on livestock, particularly sheep. 

QFPI’s $3 million Exclusion Fencing Grants Scheme supports construction of wild dog exclusion fencing in rural and remote areas. Applications closed on 31 October 2025, with applicants notified of outcomes in January 2026. 

With regards to funding for feral pig control, the Queensland Government, through QFPI Round 8(a), has invested $2.163 million for the employment of regional feral pig management coordinators, to support the initiation and the delivery of effective landscape-scale, cross-tenure feral pig management. QFPI Round 8(b) has invested $436,160 to facilitate innovation and diversification of effective and humane feral pig control tools.

The development of strategies guides effective management of invasive pests in Queensland. The Queensland Wild Dog Management Strategy 2021-2026 (the Strategy) provides statewide coordination and direction for wild dog management and is coordinated by DPI. The Strategy is complementary to the National Wild Dog Action Plan 2020-2030 and aligns with DPI’s Queensland Invasive Plants and Animals Strategy 2025-2030. 

I have recently approved a review of the Queensland Wild Dog Management Strategy 2021-2026, which will soon commence, including a stakeholder consultation process. Once the framework to guide ongoing management of wild dogs in Queensland has been determined, consideration will be given to future funding arrangements that support implementation measures. 

In responding to your questions: 

a) Queensland Government funding will be made available in 2026-27 under the next round of QFPI. This funding, titled Biosecurity Coordination — Backing Local Governments, will support biosecurity coordination across rural and remote Queensland by assisting eligible recipients to build biosecurity capacity and capability, and to strategically manage established invasive species.

b) Eligibility requirements for this QFPI round are currently being finalised through the development of applicant guidelines. Funding is intended to be available through Regional Organisations of Councils and their affiliated pest management groups. Eligibility will be determined in accordance with the applicant guidelines.

c) No funding has yet been allocated under the 2026-27 round, as applications have not opened. Funding provided during 2025-26 was delivered through a range of QFPI projects and grant programs and was allocated to approved organisations and their projects rather than by local government area. More information on previous rounds of the QFPI is available at: www.dpi.qld.gov.au/business-priorities/ biosecurity/invasive-plants-animals/qld-feral-pest-initiative.

d) The Queensland Government committed $1 million in March 2025 to support Regional Feral Pig Action Plans developed with key stakeholders to deliver priority on-ground action. DPI is finalising the Queensland Feral Pig Management Action Plan following public consultation, and regional action plans will subsequently be developed to address region-specific priorities and challenges. Future funding opportunities will be considered, including allocation of the $1 million, in line with government priorities and program objectives.

e) Funding recipients are required to meet reporting and acquittal requirements outlined in their funding agreements. Requirements can differ across funding programs; however, they typically include annual progress reports, a final report, monitoring and evaluation, and a financial acquittal at project completion. Through these reports, recipients demonstrate progress towards project completion by reporting against agreed project deliverables and outcomes.

Minister for Sport and Racing and Minister for the Olympic and Paralympic Games

Games On! assessment outcomes

Q. With reference to Budget Paper 3, p.95, which provides $57 million in 2026–27 from the Games On! Grassroots Infrastructure Program and identifies the program as supporting grassroots community sporting legacy from the 2032 Olympic and Paralympic Games— Will the Minister advise

a) the total number of applications received, approved and unsuccessful in the most recent Games On! Grassroots Infrastructure Program funding round, including the total value of funding sought compared with funding available;

b) whether further funding rounds or additional program funding are planned where demand exceeds available funding;

c) which projects within the Noosa Electorate have been approved, remain under assessment or were unsuccessful, including the Noosa Indoor Sports and Basketball Centre and Noosa Aquatic Centre redevelopment;

d) whether the Noosa Tigers changerooms, Noosa Dolphins Rugby Union Club redevelopment, Noosa Equestrian Centre and Noosa Athletics Track were assessed during the 2026–27 Budget process; and

e) how the Government will prioritise future Games On! funding for community sporting infrastructure that could support pre-Games training and participation legacy outcomes.

We will update once a response has been received.

Regional sporting infrastructure prioritisation

Q. With reference to Budget Paper 3, p.95, which provides $57 million in 2026–27 from the Games On! Grassroots Infrastructure Program and identifies the program as supporting grassroots community sporting legacy from the 2032 Olympic and Paralympic Games— Will the Minister advise

a) the total value of community sporting infrastructure funding allocated in 2026–27, reported by region,

b) the total value of funding sought from sporting organisations within the Sunshine Coast region during the 2026–27 Budget process,

c) the total value of community sporting infrastructure funding allocated within the Noosa Electorate,

d) what criteria are used to ensure regional equity when allocating community sporting infrastructure funding,

e) whether the Department measures the distribution of funding between regions and, if so, what performance measures or benchmarks are used, and

f) what Commonwealth or Brisbane 2032 Olympic and Paralympic partner funding is expected to supplement State investment in regional community sporting infrastructure during 2026–27 and the forward estimates.

We will update once a response has been received.

Minister for Transport and Main Roads

Tewantin Bypass funding and delivery

Q. With reference to the Queensland Transport and Roads Investment Program (QTRIP) 2025–26 to 2028–29 (p. 49–50), which identifies continued planning and early works for the Tewantin Bypass (Beckmans Road), with procurement scheduled for mid-2026, construction anticipated from 2028–29, and a total committed planning budget of $8.5 million— Will the Minister advise;

a) the funding allocated to the project in 2026–27 and each year of the forward estimates,

b) which project components are funded,

c) the current status of planning, detailed design and environmental approvals,

d) whether the delivery timetable remains on schedule

e) the projected funding required to complete all stages of the bypass, and whether duplication of Beckmans is being reconsidered in this.

a -b) I understand the Tewantin Bypass, Beckmans Road upgrade remains an important priority for the Noosa community. Planning work is progressing to map the long-term, staged improvements needed to provide better connections for all road users. The planning project has been allocated $8.5 million, with a further $30 million committed to commence delivery of these upgrades. The project remains on schedule to commence in 2028. 

c) Environmental investigations have been fast tracked to inform concept designs and environmental approvals. In May 2026, Noosa Shire Council (NSC), with support from my Department, submitted a referral for the project under the Environment Protection and Biodiversity Conservation Act 1999. On 10 July 2026, the proposed upgrade was declared a controlled action under that Act, requiring further federal assessment and approval before the project can progress to delivery.

 d) The project remains on schedule to commence in 2028.

Public Transport

Q. With reference to the Department of Transport and Main Roads Service Delivery Statement (p. 1), which states the Department’s purpose is “to provide reliable, resilient, and responsive transport networks and services that are safe and accessible for everyone”, and includes the strategic objective of delivering “an accessible and integrated transport system that is accessible and provides connectivity”— Will the Minister advise;

a) what public transport service improvements are funded for the Noosa Electorate during 2026–27, including any new routes, frequency improvements or timetable changes;

b) whether travel demand modelling has been undertaken for communities including Cooroy, Pomona, Kin Kin, Boreen Point and Cooran, prioritising  access to health, education and employment precincts;

c) whether the Department has completed its assessment of a Gympie North–Nambour rail shuttle and the outcomes of any patronage, operational and economic modelling undertaken;

d) when the Northern Sunshine Coast Public Transport Strategy will be publicly released; and

e) how the Department will measure unmet demand and consult Noosa residents regarding future public transport and rail service improvements.

a) In relation to public transport, while there are currently no specific major public transport projects planned solely within the Noosa electorate for 2026–27, significant investment is underway across the broader Sunshine Coast region. This includes the Beerburrum to Nambour Rail Upgrade and The Wave project, which are expected to improve connectivity for Noosa residents travelling to and from Brisbane and other Sunshine Coast centres.

d) Work on the Northern Sunshine Coast Public Transport Strategy has been finalised. Input received from the community, NSC, Sunshine Coast Regional Council and other stakeholders will inform internal planning and delivery of fit-for-purpose infrastructure and services as the northern Sunshine Coast grows and develops. I thank you for your attendance at the briefing on 22 July 2026 with my Department in relation to this matter.

e) My Department will continue to monitor patronage, land use growth and community feedback to inform future public transport planning and potential service improvements in the Noosa region. Recent planning has considered options to improve service frequency, extend operating hours and enhance bus–rail connections in consideration alongside holistic regional priorities.

Active Transport Grants Program

Q. With reference to the Department of Transport and Main Roads 2026–27 Service Delivery Statement (p.1) commitment to deliver a transport system that is accessible and provides connectivity and promoting sustainable and innovative transport solutions, including public transport initiatives and active travel options, to meet the needs of a growing population— Will the Minister advise;

a) what public transport service improvements are funded for the Noosa Electorate during 2026–27, including any new routes, frequency improvements or timetable changes,

b) whether travel demand modelling has been undertaken for communities including Cooroy, Pomona, Kin Kin, Boreen Point and Cooran, including access to health, education and employment precincts and, if so, the outcomes of that modelling,

c) whether the Department has completed its assessment of a Gympie North–Nambour rail shuttle and the outcomes of any patronage, operational and economic modelling undertaken,

d) when the Northern Sunshine Coast Public Transport Strategy will be publicly released, and

e) how the Department will measure unmet public transport demand and consult Noosa residents regarding future bus and rail service improvements.

a) In relation to public transport, while there are currently no specific major public transport projects planned solely within the Noosa electorate for 2026–27, significant investment is underway across the broader Sunshine Coast region. This includes the Beerburrum to Nambour Rail Upgrade and The Wave project, which are expected to improve connectivity for Noosa residents travelling to and from Brisbane and other Sunshine Coast centres.

 d) Work on the Northern Sunshine Coast Public Transport Strategy has been finalised. Input received from the community, NSC, Sunshine Coast Regional Council and other stakeholders will inform internal planning and delivery of fit-for-purpose infrastructure and services as the northern Sunshine Coast grows and develops. I thank you for your attendance at the briefing on 22 July 2026 with my Department in relation to this matter.

 e) My Department will continue to monitor patronage, land use growth and community feedback to inform future public transport planning and potential service improvements in the Noosa region. Recent planning has considered options to improve service frequency, extend operating hours and enhance bus–rail connections in consideration alongside holistic regional priorities.

Wildlife road safety funding

Q. With reference to the Queensland Transport and Roads Investment Program 2025–26 to 2028–29 (p.126), which states that the Road Safety Minor Works program distributes funding to respond to emerging local road safety needs— Will the Minister advise;

a) whether any grant or assistance programs are available to local governments, community organisations, wildlife groups or research organisations to reduce wildlife deaths on Queensland roads,

b) the funding allocated to each program during 2026–27 and across the forward estimates,

c) the projects funded since 2022–23,

d) whether any projects have been undertaken within the Noosa Electorate, and

e) whether the Department has assessed future funding requirements for wildlife mitigation on state-controlled roads?

The Crisafulli Government is also continuing to work with local government, community organisations and wildlife groups to address wildlife strike hotspots. Wildlife protection and connectivity will be considered as part of the Tewantin Bypass, Beckmans Road upgrade, and mitigation measures on state-controlled roads will continue to be assessed on a project-by-project basis through my Department’s environmental processes.

School Transport Assistance Scheme

Q. With reference to Budget Paper 2 (p.152) that outlined School Transport Assistance Scheme, which assists students that do not have a school in their local area or who are from defined low-income groups by reducing the cost of travelling to school on bus, rail and/or ferry services, with allowances for private vehicle transport in certain circumstances— Will the Minister advise;

a) how many School Transport Assistance Scheme applications were refused during 2025–26 because the student did not meet the nearest-state-school or catchment eligibility requirements,

b) how many of those refused applications related to families residing within the Noosa Electorate,

c) whether the Department has undertaken any review of anomalies arising from the current nearest-school eligibility rules, particularly where educational, curriculum or enrolment circumstances limit practical school choice,

d) whether any changes to eligibility criteria or additional funding have been considered to provide greater flexibility, and

e) whether the Department intends to expand hardship or appeal provisions for families adversely affected by the current eligibility rules?

In relation to school transport, the School Transport Assistance Scheme continues to provide assistance to eligible students where no education facility is available near their residence. As a statewide scheme, eligibility criteria are applied consistently to ensure transparency and fairness.

Electric Buses

Q. With reference to the Department of Transport and Main Roads 2026–27 Service Delivery Statement (p.1) commitment to ensuring the safety and reliability of transport networks through regular maintenance, upgrades and the implementation of advanced technologies, and promoting sustainable and innovative transport solutions, including public transport initiatives and active travel options— Will the Minister advise;

a) how many new electric buses are planned to enter service in 2026–27, including a breakdown by Translink region;

b) which routes servicing the Sunshine Coast, including the Noosa electorate, are expected to receive electric buses and the anticipated rollout timeframe;

c) whether all new electric buses procured under the 2026–27 program will be fitted with passenger seatbelts and, if not, the reasons why; and

d) what passenger safety standards or risk assessments informed the decision regarding the provision of seatbelts on new electric buses?

We also work to support a reliable and sustainable transition of the public transport fleet. There are currently 139 zero emission buses operating on the Translink network, including 11 zero emission buses on the Sunshine Coast network. The Crisafulli Government, in the 2026 Budget, has further invested in a number of modern Euro VI diesel buses, which will replace many of the ageing fleet and provide significant emissions reduction relative to those outgoing vehicles.

Maritime Safety Queensland resources

Q. With reference to the Department of Transport and Main Roads’ Service Delivery Statement (p. 6) outlining the Department’s responsibility for managing vessel movements on Queensland waterways, and the Sunshine Coast Regional Delivery Plan (p. 2) outlining the commencement of the Sunshine Coast Waterways Authority from 1 July 2026— Will the Minister advise;

a) how many additional Maritime Safety Queensland officers or compliance positions have been funded for the Sunshine Coast region in 2026–27;

b) how many of those additional positions will be dedicated to the Noosa River and whether they are being provided, in whole or in part, to support implementation of the Noosa River Management Plan and the establishment of the Sunshine Coast Waterways Authority;

c) the total number of Maritime Safety Queensland officers or dedicated compliance resources currently allocated to the Noosa River;

d) the number of patrols, warnings, infringements and vessel removals undertaken on the Noosa River during 2023-24, 2024-25, 2025–26; and

e) whether Maritime Safety Queensland has assessed the additional ongoing extra resourcing required to effectively implement the Noosa River Management Plan and support the Sunshine Coast Waterways Authority and, if so, the outcome of that assessment.

a) For maritime matters, there have been no new Maritime Safety Queensland (MSQ) positions funded in the Sunshine Coast region or specifically for Noosa in 2026–27. Service delivery will continue to be undertaken using existing resource allocations, with additional resources injected into the Noosa area during key phases of the Noosa River Management Plan.

b) The Sunshine Coast Waterways Authority (SCWA) was established on 1 July 2026, with the Board also appointed on that date. Since that date, two officers from MSQ are continuing to support the establishment of the SCWA, and will do so until suitable employees are recruited to take on governance and administrative functions.

Gambling advertising on TMR assets

Q. With reference to the Department of Transport and Main Roads’ 2026–27 Service Delivery Statement (p.22), which reports $333.380 million in 2025–26 estimated actual “other revenue” and $323.137 million in 2026–27 budgeted “other revenue” for the reporting entity— Will the Minister advise;

a) the revenue received by the Department from gambling-related advertising on Transport and Main Roads assets during 2025–26, reported by advertising category and asset type,

b) the projected gambling-related advertising revenue for each year of the forward estimates,

c) whether any contractual arrangements restrict or create financial penalties for the removal of gambling-related advertising from departmental assets,

d) whether the Department has assessed the financial impact of discontinuing gambling-related advertising on departmental assets and, if so, the estimated impact, and

e) whether alternative advertising revenue sources have been considered?

c) In relation to gambling advertising, my Department has a range of third-party advertising agreements in transport corridors, including roadside billboards, bus wraps, tram wraps, bus shelters and related advertising formats. Existing contractual arrangements ensure that advertising complies with applicable laws, industry codes and advertising standards.

 

Minister for Women and Women’s Economic Security, Minister for Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Partnerships and Minister for Multiculturalism

Methodology to identify emerging ongoing issues for women

Q. With reference to the Department of Women, Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Partnerships and Multiculturalism Service Delivery Statement (p.1), which commits to delivering and implementing the Women’s Economic Security Strategy to enhance women’s financial security and improve the economic security, skills development and leadership opportunities of women and girls across Queensland— Will the Minister advise;

a) what methodology, data sources and stakeholder engagement processes the Government uses to identify and assess emerging and ongoing issues affecting women across Queensland;

b) how cross-government issues, including access to justice and court delays, housing affordability and homelessness, equitable access to sporting and community infrastructure, workforce participation and personal safety, are incorporated into that assessment;

c) how women living in regional and rural communities, including the Noosa electorate, are represented in this process;

d) how priorities identified through this process inform Budget funding and policy development; and (e) whether the Government intends to publish regular reporting on emerging issues affecting women and the actions taken to address them.

We will update once a response has been received.

Minister for Youth Justice and Victim Support and Minister for Corrective Services

Serious repeat offender declarations

Q. With reference to the Department of Youth Justice and Victim Support Service Delivery Statement (p. 3), which includes the performance measure “Proportion of youth declared a serious repeat offender under the Youth Justice Act 1992 out of all youth with a proven offence finalised”— Will the Minister advise;

a) whether the serious repeat offender index (SROI) is being utilised as part of reporting;

b) the current legislative threshold for a serious repeat offender declaration under the Youth Justice Act 1992;

c) the number of serious repeat offender declarations made in 2023-2024, 2024–25 and 2025–26, reported by Youth Justice Service Centre region;

d) whether the Government has assessed amending the legislative threshold for making a serious repeat offender declaration since the introduction of Adult Crime, Adult Time reforms and, if so, the outcome of that assessment;

e) what mandatory rehabilitation, education or therapeutic programs are available to young people subject to a serious repeat offender declaration;

f) the number of young offenders being intensely case managed during the years 2023-24, 2025-26, 2026-27;

g) what performance measures or evaluation framework the Government uses to assess whether serious repeat offender declarations and intensive case management reduce reoffending.

We will update once a response has been received.

Rehabilitation Program Performance Indicators

Q. With reference to Queensland Corrective Services’ Service Delivery Statement 2026–27 (p.2-3) outlining the objective of supporting rehabilitation and reducing reoffending, and the reported service standards for prisoner program completions, in-prison re-entry support and prisoners returning to corrective services with a new correctional sanction within two years— Will the Minister advise:

a) what measures, performance indicators or evaluation frameworks Queensland Corrective Services uses to assess the effectiveness of rehabilitation and re-entry programs;

b) for each measure identified, provide the most recent available results, including any data relating to reductions in reoffending, post-release housing outcomes, post-release employment outcomes, post-release education or training outcomes, and any other indicators of program effectiveness;

c) whether any independent evaluations of rehabilitation or re-entry programs have been completed since 1 January 2023 and, if so, provide the title, completion date and program assessed for each evaluation; and

d) if Queensland Corrective Services does not use quantitative measures or independent evaluations to assess whether rehabilitation and re-entry programs reduce reoffending, why not?

We will update once a response has been received.

Long-term rehabilitation programs

Q. With reference to the Queensland Corrective Services Service Delivery Statement (p. 1), which commits to reducing reoffending by delivering rehabilitative corrective services and building strong community partnerships to support community safety— Will the Minister advise;

a) whether On-Country, culturally based residential rehabilitation programs are funded in 2026–27 within these programs;

b) the number of funded places available for each program by region;

c) which of these programs operate as court-ordered alternatives to detention;

d) whether participants continue their schooling while undertaking residential rehabilitation and what accredited education, vocational training or employment skills are provided;

e) what arrangements are in place to case manage participants into education, training or employment following completion of the programs, including the average duration of post-program support;

f) whether participation in any residential rehabilitation program may be extended where rehabilitation goals have not been achieved and, if so, under what legislative or policy framework; and

g) what completion, education, employment and recidivism outcomes are reported for each program.

We will update once a response has been received.

Recidivism Rates

Q. With reference to the Department of Corrective Services 2026–27 Service Delivery Statement (p.1) commitment to contribute to Making Queensland Safer through the rehabilitation of prisoners and offenders— Will the Minister advise;

a) the annual recidivism rate for adults released from Queensland correctional centres and young people released from youth detention for each year from 2020–21 to 2025–26, reported separately;

b) the proportion of adults and young people who returned to custody within 6 months, 12 months and 24 months of release for each of those years;

c) what factors the Queensland Government has identified as contributing to changes in recidivism rates for adults and young people over that period; and

d) what performance measures, targets and evaluation framework have been established to assess the effectiveness of the Staying on Track program and other 2026–27 rehabilitation initiatives in reducing recidivism for adults and young people.

We will update once a response has been received.

Continuity of rehabilitation from youth detention to adult prison

Q. With reference to the Queensland Corrective Services Service Delivery Statement (p. 1), which commits to reducing reoffending by delivering rehabilitative corrective services and building strong community partnerships to support community safety— Will the Minister advise;

a) how many young people transferred from youth detention to an adult corrective services facility during 2024–25 and 2025–26;

b) what arrangements are in place to ensure continuity of rehabilitation, education, vocational training and case management following transfer from youth detention to an adult corrective services facility, including whether an individual transition plan accompanies each transfer;

c) whether specific funding has been allocated in 2026–27 to support continuity of rehabilitation and transition services for this cohort;

d) how information relating to rehabilitation, education, vocational training, risk assessments and case management is transferred between the Department of Youth Justice and Victim Support and Queensland Corrective Services; and

e) what long-term outcomes are monitored for this cohort, including rates of program completion, educational attainment, employment following release and reoffending.

We will update once a response has been received.

Financial Assistance for victims

Q. With reference to the Department of Youth Justice and Victim Support 2026–27 Service Delivery Statement (p.2) providing $18.9 million for Victim Assist Queensland to continue supporting victims of crime— Will the Minister advise;

a) what financial assistance schemes are available to victims of non-violent offences in Queensland and the eligibility criteria for each;

b) the number of applications for financial assistance from victims of non-violent offences received, approved and declined in each year from 2022–23 to 2025–26, reported by offence category;

c) the total value of financial assistance provided to victims of non-violent offences in each of those years, reported by offence category; and

d) whether the Government has undertaken, or intends to undertake, a review of the eligibility criteria or levels of financial assistance available to victims of non-violent offences and, if so, the outcome or anticipated timeframe for that review.

We will update once a response has been received.

Transitional housing for people leaving detention

With reference to the Queensland Corrective Services 2026–27 Service Delivery Statement (p.1) commitment to reduce reoffending by delivering rehabilitative corrective services and build strong community partnerships to support community safety—

Will the Minister advise (a) what transitional accommodation programs are funded in 2026–27 for people exiting custody, reported separately for young people leaving youth detention and adults leaving correctional centres; (b) the number of funded transitional accommodation places available by region, reported separately for young people and adults; (c) how many young people leaving youth detention and adults leaving correctional centres exited custody into homelessness or unstable accommodation during 2023-24,  2024–25 and 2025–26, and; (d) what pre-release planning arrangements and partnerships exist with the Department of Housing and Public Works, the Department of Youth Justice and Victim Support, and community housing or specialist homelessness organisations to improve housing outcomes for people exiting custody, reported separately for young people and adults.

We will update once a response has been received.

 Youth Crime Prevention and Early Intervention Initiatives

With reference to the Department of Youth Justice and Victim Support 2026–27 Service Delivery Statement (p.1) commitment to continue delivery of Regional Reset early intervention programs, which provide a short stay ‘reset’ for youth demonstrating high-risk behaviours, and pathways into education, training and employment—

Will the Minister advise (a) whether the Department has assessed opportunities to establish or partner with a Noosa-based youth hub or similar place-based early intervention initiative as part of the Regional Reset or other youth crime prevention programs, (b) what 2026–27 funding is available for local governments and community organisations to partner in youth crime prevention and early intervention initiatives, (c) what Department-funded youth crime prevention and early intervention programs currently operate within the Noosa Electorate, (d) whether Noosa Shire Council and local community organisations have been consulted regarding future place-based youth crime prevention initiatives, and (e) what criteria are used to determine locations for new Regional Reset sites and other place-based youth crime prevention programs?

We will update once a response has been received.

Treasurer, Minister for Energy and Minister for Home Ownership

Land tax thresholds and housing affordability

With reference to the Queensland Budget 2026–27 Budget Strategy and Outlook, which confirms the land tax liability thresholds remain at $600,000 for resident individuals and $350,000 for companies, trusts and absentees (Budget Paper 2, p. 167–168), with no changes announced in the 2026–27 Budget—

Will the Treasurer advise (a) whether Treasury prepared advice or modelling during the 2026–27 Budget process regarding increasing or indexing land tax thresholds, (b) the estimated revenue impact of each option considered, (c) whether Treasury assessed the impact of land tax on residential rents and commercial leases for small businesses, (d) whether any analysis was undertaken of impacts in high-value regional housing markets including Noosa, and (e) why no land tax threshold changes were included in the 2026–27 Budget?

We will update once a response has been received.

 Stamp duty exemption for seniors downsizing

With reference to Queensland Treasury’s Service Delivery Statement (p. 1), which states that Treasury will continue to deliver the Government’s Boost to Buy home ownership scheme while partnering with stakeholders to address housing supply and affordability challenges to lift Queensland’s home ownership rate—

Will the Treasurer advise (a) whether Treasury prepared advice during the 2026–27 Budget process regarding a transfer duty concession or exemption for Seniors Card holders downsizing their principal place of residence, (b) the estimated fiscal impact of any options considered, (c) whether Treasury modelled the potential increase in housing supply arising from downsizing incentives, (d) what interstate schemes were examined, and (e) why no downsizing concession was included in the Budget?

We will update once a response has been received.

 Small business tax relief package

With reference to Queensland Treasury’s Service Delivery Statement (p. 2), including the extension of the 50% payroll tax rebate on wages of apprentices and trainees until 30 June 2027—

Will the Treasurer advise (a) whether Treasury prepared advice, modelling or policy options during the development of the 2026–27 Budget regarding broader payroll tax, transfer duty or land tax relief for small and family businesses, (b) the estimated fiscal impact of each option considered, (c) whether Treasury assessed the impact of state taxation and broader operating costs on the viability of tourism, hospitality and retail businesses, particularly in regional communities including Noosa, (d) whether any direct taxation relief for small and family businesses, other than the payroll tax rebate for apprentices and trainees, was considered during the Budget process and, if so, why it was not included in the 2026–27 Budget, and (e) whether further taxation reforms affecting small and family businesses remain under active consideration during the forward estimates.

We will update once a response has been received.

 Worker accommodation grants

With reference to Queensland Treasury’s Service Delivery Statement (p. 2), which states that Treasury will partner with stakeholders to address housing supply and affordability challenges to lift Queensland’s home ownership rate—

Will the Treasurer advise (a) whether Treasury prepared advice, modelling or policy options during the development of the 2026–27 Budget regarding financial incentives or grant programs to support the delivery of worker accommodation by employers, community organisations or industry groups, (b) whether any such options were costed and, if so, the estimated cost of each option, (c) whether Treasury assessed the impacts of workforce housing shortages on regional economies and key industries, including tourism and hospitality in communities such as Noosa, and (d) whether targeted worker accommodation incentives remain under consideration during the forward estimates.

We will update once a response has been received.

Housing affordability modelling

With reference to the Queensland Treasury Service Delivery Statement (p. 2), which provides for the continuation of the $30,000 First Home Owner Grant for eligible new homes valued at up to $750,000—

Will the Treasurer advise (a) what modelling Treasury undertook to assess the impact of these initiatives on housing affordability across South East Queensland; (b) whether Treasury modelled the number of new dwellings expected to be available for purchase below $750,000, reported by financial year and local government area; (c) whether Treasury assessed the impact of these initiatives on housing affordability in high-cost communities such as Noosa; and (d) what proportion of new dwellings delivered or enabled through these initiatives is expected to be available for purchase below $750,000?

We will update once a response has been received.

Queensland Energy Roadmap implementation

With reference to the Queensland Treasury Service Delivery Statement (p. 1), which identifies delivery of the Queensland Energy Roadmap as a key priority—

Will the Treasurer advise (a) whether Treasury prepared advice during the development of the 2026–27 Budget regarding a whole-of-government implementation framework for achieving Queensland’s net zero emissions target by 2050, (b) whether consideration has been given to establishing a dedicated whole-of-government governance, implementation or reporting framework to monitor progress across agencies, (c) what whole-of-government performance measures or reporting mechanisms are currently used to monitor progress towards the Government’s emissions reduction and net zero commitments, (d) whether enhanced public reporting on implementation of the Queensland Energy Roadmap will be introduced during the forward estimates.

We will update once a response has been received.

Premier and Minister for Veterans

Review of Governance Systems

With reference to the Department of the Premier and Cabinet Service Delivery Statement (pp.1–2), which identifies the Department’s objectives of “an accountable and effective government” and key deliverables to drive cross-agency policy, improve service delivery and pursue excellence in legislative drafting—

Will the Premier advise whether the Government has considered progressing during 2026–27 any governance or parliamentary reforms, including (a) a further review of public sector governance arrangements following the Coaldrake Review, (b) reforms to the parliamentary committee or Estimates system, (c) broader government governance and accountability structures, (d) the establishment of an independent electoral and administrative review body or similar governance reform mechanism, and (e) what assessment has been undertaken of the effectiveness of Queensland’s current parliamentary accountability and governance arrangements.

We will update once a response has been received.

Veterans support following Australian Government allied health change

With reference to the Department of the Premier and Cabinet Service Delivery Statement (p.2), which states the Department will enhance engagement with the veterans’ community and stakeholders to develop, coordinate and implement policies, programs and initiatives to support veterans—

Will the Premier advise (a) whether any State funding has been allocated or existing programs expanded during 2026–27 to support veterans who may experience reduced access to allied health services following recent Commonwealth changes to veterans’ allied health arrangements, (b) whether the Government is developing any additional policies, programs or initiatives to address increased demand for health, wellbeing or community support services for veterans, (c) what engagement has occurred with the Australian Government, ex-service organisations and veteran support providers regarding the impacts of these Commonwealth changes on Queensland veterans, and (d) whether the Government has undertaken any assessment of the likely impacts of these changes on demand for Queensland-funded health, wellbeing or veteran support services.

We will update once a response has been received.

 

 

STAY UPDATED

Subscribe to our monthly newsletter and never miss an update.